nDroae a écrit :

"Son of the Sun" was impressive and clearly symphonic in the true sense. Y'know, speaking of songs being carefully crafted, I read that Epica's "Kingdom of Heaven" took three years to compose, but to me it's rather boring. I can't tell if that's entirely because I don't like progressive metal much, or also in part because the song turned out messy. :-P I actually want to invest less time expanding my musical horizons from now on than I have since 2006; I bought a load of music in that time that I don't really enjoy, although sometimes I like it better when I listen to it again a year or more after the first time. This, for example. XD

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à nDroae

ringwraith10 a écrit :

Though I agree with you, florianblaschke -- music shouldn't be something that a band can produce in an hour. A song needs to have more thought and effort put into it than many of the popular songs that people are listening to right now. To me, not only does the music need to be of a high quality or unique in some way, but the lyrics need to mean something. I've heard some REALLY crappy songs recently that make me want to vomit -- they have very little effort put into the music, and the lyrics look like the songwriters opened a dictionary, closed their eyes, and put their finger on a word and used that method for creating lyrics. Not cool.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à ringwraith10

ringwraith10 a écrit :

The problem here is that the "metal" genre has become so confusing and convoluted recently. Not only do we now have genres like "nu-metal", which can't decide if they're metal or hard rock, but certain old metal bands are now being slammed for not being metal enough *cough*Metallica*cough*. I find it hard to determine whether something is actually *metal* or not, and it seems that this genre is now up for individual interpretation.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à ringwraith10

florianblaschke a écrit :

You see, the genre is not always easy to appreciate but demands some dedication and time of you. "Growers" are a good thing, in my experience. There are songs and albums that I immediately loved and that I never tired of but those are very rare. Good music is music that you can listen to again and again, even after many years and changing tastes or further experiences (whether in music or in life) and you keep discovering new aspects. I know I have taken years to get into some genres, bands and albums that are among my favourites now. If that's not your thing and you want a quick fix, no problem, but that's not what THIS genre is about. It's not mere background music. For an example (somewhat random) of a symphonic metal song that's also a carefully crafted metal song see "Son of the Sun" by Therion and pay attention to the guitar, especially the beginning riff and the solo at 4:00.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à florianblaschke

florianblaschke a écrit :

ringwraith10: IF a band arranges all their orchestra parts THEMSELVES in addition to writing the outlines, I sure DO respect that accomplishment. But you cannot take that for granted and impressing your audience through the virtuosity of guest musicians (and the accomplishments of hired guns) instead of your own is lame. nDroae: Sorry for you, but you see, the question "metal or not?" is not just a subjective assessment and that you need a certain background and experience for a proper estimation. I highly respect all the true metal, whether traditional, power, speed, thrash, death, black, doom, gothic, prog, avantgarde, folk or whatever, even if I don't enjoy all those genres equally, and all bands that display musicianship, but I oppose dumbing down the genre. Alternative metal is a case in point, because it is based on hardcore punk rather than metal and lacks the sophistication of real metal. I'm not much into, say, technical death metal but I do respect the sophistication thereof.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à florianblaschke

nDroae a écrit :

I have read that part of the Wikipedia article before, but I can't translate it into an ability to tell whether something I'm listening to is metal (or good metal) or not, since I've never been a serious student of music. Avant-garde vs. alternative metal is interesting, I was under the impression that "alternative metal" was just a fad tag for metal-influenced rock music like Flyleaf. :D

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à nDroae

ringwraith10 a écrit :

I seem to be a little late in this conversation, but I do want to say that if you DO write the parts for an orchestra (including writing the arrangements for all of the different instruments), that is certainly talent. If a band were to include an orchestra playing an arrangement that THEY wrote, then I can't see any reason to criticize them. I can't definitely name any bands that have done this, though, as I haven't researched the topic. For all I know, there might not be any. I'm just saying that if a band WERE to do this, it would be an admirable feat.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à ringwraith10

florianblaschke a écrit :

What annoys people is mainly the impression that the orchestra is used as a way to cover up the deficits and weaknesses that the music otherwise has, and make easy-listening rock music that uneducated listeners associate with the "genius" image of symphonic composers. As for metal from a musical point of view, try this and this.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à florianblaschke

florianblaschke a écrit :

Correction: "There's more to orchestra metal than the orchestra parts." Oh, and hiring someone to write or arrange the orchestra parts is even less worthy of admiration. It certainly doesn't turn you into a great composer.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à florianblaschke

nDroae a écrit :

Ah, I hadn't considered the origin of the term or possible meanings. To me "symphonic" has only meant definition 1a: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/symphony "an elaborate instrumental composition in three or more movements, similar in form to a sonata but written for an orchestra and usually of far grander proportions and more varied elements." I like definition 4 though. I should add that I still don't think I really know what metal is either. :-P

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à nDroae

florianblaschke a écrit :

Outsourcing musicianship from the band to guest musicians goes right against the spirit of metal, which includes a certain level of musicianship and "extremeness" in the band that makes it more challenging to fully appreciate than mainstream pop. It's easy to find skilled guest musicians and write challenging parts for them. There's nothing admirable in that, it's just showing off other people's skills and your own financial power. That said, it's easy to impress with an orchestra because everything sounds better when it is played by a skilled orchestra, especially Disney-esque soundtrack-ish music that is an imitation of an imitation of an imitation of real classical music.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à florianblaschke

florianblaschke a écrit :

If orchestras were relevant to symphonic metal it would be called orchestra metal. But it isn't. Actually "symphonic" is a far more precise description if you look at the original meaning of the word: "sounding together". You don't need a real orchestra at all to achieve a "symphonic" sound. cognitive21st: There is more to orchestra metal than the orchestra parts, and the metal part. Orchestra metal with mediocre metal parts and mediocre songwriting as well as mediocre vocals is mediocre, as impressive as the orchestra parts may be. At the base, symphonic or orchestra metal is still METAL (at least that's what the term says - it doesn't say "metallised orchestra pop rock" or something like that), so I will judge it mainly by the metal parts - the orchestra is just a nice aside but not essential to the music. After all, when you go see the band, who is playing is the band, not the orchestra, especially when it comes from backup tapes.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à florianblaschke

nDroae a écrit :

Okay... Therion and After Forever aren't more popular than Nightwish or WT, nor is that what florianblaschke meant. I don't think they're better, either, but it doesn't matter. According to the true definition of symphonic metal, orchestra is irrelevant; symphonic structure in the music would be all that matters. However I think it's best to ignore that and equate "symphonic" with "orchestral" because otherwise you'll just be a lone voice yelling at the mob to run the other way, pointless. And Evanescence is not gothic rock; that was first-generation goth music back in the late 70's and 80's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_rock Evanescence are gothic and rock but not gothic rock. I realize that calling out misuse of the "gothic rock" tag is also yelling at the mob, but in that case my respect for first-generation goths compels me to. :) That's not the case with symphonic metal.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à nDroae

cognitive21st a écrit :

@florianblaschke (your 3rd last comment) : who said those bands are better....being more popular does NOT mean you can classify them as better.......if you dont like it then its not better for you!! and if you do then it is!!!

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à cognitive21st

cognitive21st a écrit :

@florianblaschke (your 3rd last comment): what orchestral obsession of NW are you talking about?? it is orchestra that makes this genre named as symphonic metal; are you saying that orchestral emphasis is destructive for this genre??? well then i m bound to disagree; i think its orchestra along with metal ofcourse, that makes this genre so unique; beauty with strength!! on the other hand i think that evanesence and WT do NOT qualify as symphonic metal bands because most of evanesence's music fit in gothic rock and WT's in symphonic rock !!?? and lastly i think all of this genre classification of bands is just a little stupid; cuz bands never want to be restricted to be certain type of music; they mostly like to experiment; as you can see therion underwent a major genre shift....so you can classify tracks, maybe albums in most cases but bands can be very rarely classified as belonging to a certain genre!!! peace

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à cognitive21st

Amireas a écrit :

therion , rhapsody , haggard , epica , tarja , ...

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à Amireas

Emtay13 a écrit :

Top artists suck, excluding Therion and After Forever.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à Emtay13

Carnassial1 a écrit :

Cheers everyone! You can vote for "Symphonic metal" in "Favorite Heavy metal Sub-genre Poll" on my profile page Carnassial1 It's over 2000 votes now. I'll be glad if you take a shot.

Voir le profil | Laissez un shout à Carnassial1