libcom

Discussions en cours

rknrkn a commenté sur “Make us a logo + artists connections” (5)   octobre 2010

Waagbistritz69 a commenté sur “Hello & music request!” (3)   octobre 2010

“off topic?” janvier 2009

rknrkn a commenté sur “pleasantly surprised” (6)   mars 2007

• Harliquensfly a écrit :
  septembre 2011

  So what are you guys marxists or kroptkinites?

  Laissez un shout à Harliquensfly

• fruehlingsorbit a écrit :
  avril 2011

  *hums* Negras tormentas agitan los aires, nubes oscuras nos impiden ver...

  Laissez un shout à fruehlingsorbit

• inducedmadness a écrit :
  novembre 2010

  @adjustyourpenis: what not to do :)

  Laissez un shout à inducedmadness

• adjustyourpenis a écrit :
  septembre 2010

  what exactly does leninism have to contribute?

  Laissez un shout à adjustyourpenis

• fuckoffplebeian a écrit :
  juillet 2010

  Leninism does not 'suck'. While Leninism ultimately failed as an ideology in practice there are many lessons to be learned and many parts of it can and should still be applied in the struggle today. Fail, fail again, fail better.

  Laissez un shout à fuckoffplebeian

• Waagbistritz69 a écrit :
  avril 2010

  AgeofGrunge> Are you ok? Leninism sucks

  Laissez un shout à Waagbistritz69

• AgeofGrunge a écrit :
  juillet 2009

  ████████████████████████░░▒█████████████ ██████████████████████████░░░░██████████ ███████████████████████████▓░░░░████████ █████████████▒░░░░███████████░░░░░██████ ███████████▒░░░░░░░███████████░░░░░█████ ██████████▒░░░░░░██████████████░░░░░████ ████████▒░░░░░░░████████████████░░░░░███ ██████░░░░░░░░░░█████████████████░░░░▒██ █████░░░░░░░█▒░░▒████████████████▓░░░░░█ ███████░░░░████░░░▒███████████████░░░░░█ ████████▒███████▒░░░░█████████████░░░░░█ ██████████████████░░░▒▓███████████░░░░░█ ███████████████████▒░░░░██████████░░░░░▓ █████████████████████▓░░░▒███████▓░░░░░█ ██████████████████████▒░░░░▒█████░░░░░░█ ████████████████████████░░░░░███░░░░░░░█ ████████░░░██████████████▓░░░░▓▒░░░░░░██ ██████▒░░░░░░░░████████████░░░░░░░░░░░██ █████▓░░░██▒░░░░░░░░▒████░░░░░░░░░░░▓███ ███▒░░░███████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░████ █░░░░░███████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒██ ░░░░░████████████████░░░░░░░░████░░░░░░█ ░░░░███████████████████████████████▓░░░█

  Laissez un shout à AgeofGrunge

• gregass a écrit :
  juin 2009

  Who like R.D.F, Subhumans, P.A.I.N, etc. I need more music along these veins.

  Laissez un shout à gregass

• fenixk19 a écrit :
  mars 2009

  Hello, Comrades!

  Laissez un shout à fenixk19

• skumbot a écrit :
  février 2009

  Libertarian Communism isn't about creating "libertarian communist" nations or countries, but the abolition of states as part of the process of creating a self-managed society. This isn't something to be held over the heads of people after the "withering away" of the state, but a real goal. Libertarian Communis, is another term for socialist anarchism. An "anti-capitalist state" is an oxymoron, as the modern state is both a prerequisite and necessity for the functioning of capitalism ( as can be seen currently ). Libertarian communists see state socialist regimes (such as Cuba, former USSR etc) as being forms of state capitalism, in which the fundamendal aspects of capitalism remain, with the state as universal employer. Wage labour, capital, money, property etc still exist, as does class struggle. Seriously, its much better to ask questions at libcom.org, this group is just a spin-off from that site. Forums here: http://libcom.org/forums

  Laissez un shout à skumbot

• moismyname a écrit :
  février 2009

  ...and the more it will depend on authoritarianism to deal with that. history shows that authoritarian states don't usually decrease authoritarianism on their own, and in the few cases that has happened, the opposition have always used their new freedom to take over. that's why i don't believe in revolution, i believe in reformism, and i believe that the only way to effectively beat capitalism is by using it's own main weapon: efficiency. take an average, liberal (in the european sense of the word), democratic western constitution, make a few slight adjustments to allow a legal status and financing system for worker-controlled enterprises and let them compete with traditional capitalist companies in a (fairly) free market. as long as a public financing system is guaranteed and efficient enough to get it's money back, the prospect of profit-sharing will draw the more motivated and diligent workers, leaving companies based on private capital to die out. that's how i see it, anyway.

  Laissez un shout à moismyname

• moismyname a écrit :
  février 2009

  if you establish a proclaimed anti-capitalist state, you will always have capitalist states denouncing, boycotting and sabotaging you, simply because they feel threatened. this is true for any anti-capitalist state, whether communist, libertarian socialist or whatever. a world-wide revolution sounds good, but revolutionaries world-wide can't even agree on the economic-political system that is be introduced, let alone get together to pull off a stunt like that. even if they could, at this time in history they would not have the support of the population, because people (especially those in economically powerful nations, which are the ones that count) are simply too compliant with what they know and too afraid of change. so they would have to use authoritarianism as a means to achieve their goals. once authoritarianism has established itself within a system, it is pretty much impossible to get it back out: the more authoritarian a system is, the more internal opposition it will have...

  Laissez un shout à moismyname

• tc-obo a écrit :
  février 2009

  Libertarian communism could not exist in a world where some nations are still capitalist - and neither could any other form of communism.

  Laissez un shout à tc-obo

• deepfriedbrain a écrit :
  janvier 2009

  http://www.last.fm/group/Prison+Abolition

  Laissez un shout à deepfriedbrain

• deepfriedbrain a écrit :
  janvier 2009

  ok but then riddle me this... how could libertarian communism exist in a multi-national context where some nations are capitalist? No nation, especially in this day and age is self sufficient, so how would a libertarian communist country open its borders for trade while maintaining a closed egalitarian society? It's what many economists argued was the fall of the Soviet Union... of course if a Communist revolution actually reaches its theoretical goal: the destruction of worldwide capitalism and the abolition of the wage system... then the need for a State, as we define it in modern contexts, is no more. Then perhaps you'd have what you call Libertarian Communism? Although Anarcho Communism or Syndicalism I think are better names for the red and black... @franko-gap: you're right, in the USA everything is politically backward (after all, the right wingers are "red" and labor day is in September!!) and I realize I misunderstood the use of "libertarian."

  Laissez un shout à deepfriedbrain

• franko-gap a écrit :
  décembre 2008

  @ deepfriedbrain Listen, Marxist! :-p After the fall of Paris Commune in France were forbidden all kind of socialist, and especially anarchist organization. So the anarchist organizations started to name themselves in different ways - libertarian was one of them. So, in Europe and, for what I know, in most of the world, the word is more-less a synonym for anarchism. Libertarian (anarchist) communism is the ideal advocated by Kropotkin and many other revolutionaries till today. In USA, however, everything is upside-down and a political ignorance prevails: Obama a leftist? Come on, people! You can't be SO stupid... So in USA libertarian means something different than in the rest of the world... :-/ Any politically educated human will notice the cretinism of your cited Reagan: liberalism (the classic one, not the new economic market-liberalism) is the opposed of conservativism; and libertarianism is beyond liberalism, it is more radical, it is revolutionary.

  Laissez un shout à franko-gap

• franko-gap a écrit :
  décembre 2008

  Fuk mp3s! I want Oggs! Free software in a free society. ;-)

  Laissez un shout à franko-gap

• skumbot a écrit :
  décembre 2008

  Quoting Friedrich von Hayek. Epic fail. Heres a good start. http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secI1.html

  Laissez un shout à skumbot

• dyingdreams a écrit :
  décembre 2008

  You guys have absolutely no idea of what you're talking about, at all. Anti-Socialism

  Laissez un shout à dyingdreams

• skumbot a écrit :
  septembre 2008

  Hiya. This is Django from the boards.

  Laissez un shout à skumbot