Pink Floyd is not prog! It is primitive!

Malmhake a écrit :

I think someone listened to Young Lust and didn't realise that it's suppose to make fun of rock clichés.

Laissez un shout à Malmhake

tribaltyn a écrit :

fail

Laissez un shout à tribaltyn

megajosh2 a écrit :

Whoever made this group has too limited a view of what progressive rock is.

Laissez un shout à megajosh2

FacelessShadows a écrit :

Though I'll admit I don't like the fact that heaps of newer Progressive Rock bands seem to exclusively base themselves upon Pink Floyd

Laissez un shout à FacelessShadows

FacelessShadows a écrit :

Wow, musical snobbery on last.fm, so surprising.

Laissez un shout à FacelessShadows

sobreviviente11 a écrit :

I agree that Pink Floyd is less progressive than KC or GG, but progressivity doesn't mean only complexity of composition. Progressive means also using new techniques, instruments, combining instruments and styles that haven't been combined before (Atom Heart Mother? hello?). And, maybe the most important, ambitious attitude for making music. Long compositions, concept albums, influences from surrealistic music and classic (aleatoric, to be specific). And for the love of no-god - PF commited only two questionable albums - Momentary Lapse Of Reason and Division Bell (and maybe Final Cut), and they are NOT known and worshipped for THESE works, so this group is just stupid, although I totally agree that neo-prog like Marillion is crap, and listening to them makes me vomit.

Laissez un shout à sobreviviente11

Barely-A-Vapor a écrit :

This group is just stupid... [3]

Laissez un shout à Barely-A-Vapor

Equality7-2521 a écrit :

This group is just stupid... [2]

Laissez un shout à Equality7-2521

gabrielcavaresi a écrit :

LOL

Laissez un shout à gabrielcavaresi

Matzomixxx a écrit :

gogitosbanditos. i stopped reading your bullshit when you said Britney is better than pink floyd ... and i dont really think you know what progressive means

Laissez un shout à Matzomixxx

M-Phase-I-Saw a écrit :

"Of course I'm talking about later stuff." <- How about putting a bit more emphasis on that? Still, I won't let music like their four big albums be called "primitive" as in flat or uninspired. I admit, personally, I've defined the prog genre via its complex rhythm and virtuoso use of sound spectra for a long time. But I've come to look at those artists as expressionists of their complexity within, which may also include simple sound patterns (such as ELP's "Lucky Man"). To me, the Floyd's early works reflected a true spirit of experimentalism and virtuosity. Technique is only as authentic as the spirit beneath it.

Laissez un shout à M-Phase-I-Saw

kissesneverdie a écrit :

Are the Ramones "prog"? =p

Laissez un shout à kissesneverdie

RaditAndrogyny a écrit :

This group is just stupid...

Laissez un shout à RaditAndrogyny

UserNameMissing a écrit :

Hello! Prog rock is not only ''complex music''. It's also about lyrics, variety of instruments, different song structures (doesn't have to mean thousands of different time signatures) and so on... Probably nothing new here, but just had to say something...Thank you.

Laissez un shout à UserNameMissing

Lucifer-Sam a écrit :

atom heart mother

Laissez un shout à Lucifer-Sam

Morkburger a écrit :

...Failures.

Laissez un shout à Morkburger

Jiffy_No0b a écrit :

This isn't how genres work.

Laissez un shout à Jiffy_No0b

shlshred a écrit :

Lady Gaga and Ramones are on the charts! what a prog group!

Laissez un shout à shlshred