'pataphysics » Discussions

INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION

 
    • phillip360 a dit :...
    • Utilisateur
    • 10 nov. 2008, 23h12m

    INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION

    Membership applications are approved in batches of 5. No individual membership application will be declined. The pursuit of membership applications might be encouraged by existing members. Once applications of membership become pending applications of membership they may only be sometimes approved in batches of 5. The quantity of individual membership applications is and will remain proportional to the quantity of pending applications of membership. Artist connections may be suggested by members via the shoutbox. When the permitted quantity of artist connections becomes full to bursting, a user may delete connected artists with the intention to later replenish the list of connected artists with connections deemed more or less suitable. In this case, one deletion is equal to one addition. Applications of membership and pending applications of membership are approved in batches of 5 unless the number of individual membership applications is and remains proportional to the quantity of pending applications of membership under which circumstance, applications of membership may still only be sometimes approved in batches of 5. Approved applications of membership that are followed by good service to 'pataphysical endeavor may result in untimely departure from the group. Under circumstances whereupon members leave the group in batches of 5 then the member that illuminated them to the group may or may not choose to leave also and a bugle can be sounded. This potential disruption does not however affect any individual membership and should be referred to as; A molten commitment to bureaucratic resolution. Applications of membership that have not been submitted yet and pending applications of membership that have not been submitted yet are proportional to applications of membership and pending applications of membership that have been approved in batches of 5 unless the quantity of applications of membership that have not been submitted yet and pending applications of membership that have not been submitted yet is disproportionate. This potential disproportion does not however affect an individual membership application that is and remains proportional to the quantity of pending applications of membership and as such any applications of membership may still only be sometimes approved in batches of 5. Users intending to apply for membership of this group that will eventually not submit and users for whom pending applications of membership may or may not be affected by their mood at the time of application that has not been submitted yet are proportional to applications of membership and pending applications of membership that have been approved in batches of 5 unless the quantity of applications of membership that have not been submitted yet and pending applications of membership that have not been submitted yet is disproportionate. If users intending to apply for membership of this group that will eventually not submit and users for whom pending applications of membership may or may not be affected by their mood at the time of application are however potentially disproportionate to the quantity of applications of membership and pending applications of membership that have been approved in batches of 5, then an individual membership application that is and remains proportional to the quantity of pending applications of membership may or may not be declined and as such any applications of membership may still only be sometimes approved in batches of 5. However this may never occur and in any case * ******** remains the pundit and high arbiter of all matter.

    Comments (0)

    You are required to comment on this thread.
    Modifié par phillip360 le 13 oct. 2009, 19h11m
  • A point of clarification please:

    What happens if it occurs that a member illuminates a group of 5 new members but those 5 members are actually 1 ubiquitous member but each of those 5 members (that are 1 ubiquitous member) illuminates 5 non-ubiquitous, non-members and those non-ubiquitous, non-members are actually the non-ubiquitous member that illuminated the 5 new members that are actually the one ubiquitous member?

    Perhaps a diagram would help?



    That's more than enough!
    • [Utilisateur supprimé] a dit :...
    • Utilisateur
    • 17 nov. 2008, 4h46m

    • UbuMerdre a dit :...
    • Utilisateur
    • 17 nov. 2008, 17h38m
    Damn the INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION there is no place in 'pataphysics for silly rules! Let us throw the INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION overboard after the salty tyrant - but we may keep the bugle and blow it loud, as we sound the trumpets, ring the chimes and drone the captains drones, for the return of the bold partisans from exile. Hurrah Hurrah!

    Exquis, exquis! Vive la mère Ubu
    • phillip360 a dit :...
    • Utilisateur
    • 19 nov. 2008, 23h10m

    APPENDAGE TO THE INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION (ORNITHOLOGICAL)

    If it occurs that a member illuminates a group of 5 new members but those 5 members are actually 1 ubiquitous member but each of those 5 members (that are 1 ubiquitous member) illuminates 5 non-ubiquitous, non-members and those non-ubiquitous, non-members are actually the non-ubiquitous member that illuminated the 5 new members that are actually the one ubiquitous member then a bugle may be sounded under the following circumstances; if a member illuminates a group of 5 new members, if those 5 members are actually 1 ubiquitous member, if each of those 5 members (that are 1 ubiquitous member) illuminates 5 non-ubiquitous, if non-members and non-ubiquitous non-members are actually the non-ubiquitous member that illuminated the 5 new members that are actually the one ubiquitous member. Should under any circumstances the INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION be damned by any of the above then there may or may not be or not be no place in 'pataphysics for rules.

    Comments (0)

    You are required to comment on this thread.
  • [paste]bollocks[/paste]

  • there needs to be something in there about pirates. yours truly

    i'm a vegetable

    best thread ever.
    • phillip360 a dit :...
    • Utilisateur
    • 30 avr. 2009, 20h30m

    ADDITIONAL APPENDAGE TO THE INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION (PLAGIARISTIC)

    Applications of membership from pirates and pending applications of membership from pirates are approved in batches of 5 unless the number of individual membership applications from pirates is and remains proportional to the quantity of pending applications of membership from pirates under which circumstance, applications of membership may still only be sometimes approved in batches of 5 unless one or all applications of membership are made by a pirate or by some pirates. If one or all applications of membership are made by a pirate or by some pirates then one or all existing members may exclaim some sentences about theft in a loud voice and also a bugle can be sounded.

    Comments (0)

    You are required to comment on this thread.
  • [paste]Damn the INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION there is no place in 'pataphysics for silly rules![/paste]

    That's more than enough!
  • if you think these rules as "silly" then sound the bugles and be gone with you

    i'm a vegetable

    best thread ever.
  • Fuck them fuckin bugles. [paste]There is no place in 'pataphysics for silly bugles[/paste]

  • not those bugles you nitwit, these


    i'm a vegetable

    best thread ever.
  • Fr0mN0where said:
    [paste]Damn the INTERIM CIRCUMSTANCES OF MODIFICATION there is no place in 'pataphysics for silly rules![/paste]


    You may read the last section of this earlier post; http://www.last.fm/group/%27pataphysics/forum/106396/_/475337/1#f7831251

    Comments (0)

    You are required to comment on this thread.
  • Oh right but we can keep the silly bugles right? Where would 'pataphyscis be without silly bugles?


    That's more than enough!
  • me likes it silly

  • // After exploding by $bugle, every entry in $arr except (possibly) part of the last entry should have its content returned.
    $arr = explode($bugle,$haystack,$n_occurrence);
    // Examine last entry in $arr. If it contains $bugle, cut out all text except for the text before $bugle.
    $last = count($arr) - 1;
    $pos_in_last = strpos($arr[$last],$bugle);

    Wu-Tang ^_^ "Koester niet in het minst herinneringen."

    Cherish not in the least memories

    Technology has changed the face of living, and humanity is a strange creature.

    TRavvy
  • This is very useful mellow_boy and it got me to a pondering I thought perhaps

    while ($bugles > 1) {
    $rules = 1;
    }
    foreach($rule{'silly'}) {
    modify($circumstances, $interim);
    }
    while ($i > $truth) {
    $i--;
    }
    sub modify {
    my ($circumstances, $interim) = @_;
    die unless $^O =~ /plectrum/i;
    }
    Glob bless{pataphysics};

    Unfortunately I get run time errors_ sigh

    That's more than enough!
    • phillip360 a dit :...
    • Utilisateur
    • 10 nov. 2010, 22h50m
    (lines 5&6) This is being looked into:

    modify($circumstances, $interim);
    }

    Comments (0)

    You are required to comment on this thread.
Les utilisateurs anonymes ne peuvent pas poster de messages. Merci de vous connecter ou de créer un compte pour pouvoir intervenir dans les forums.